Value of Advice
By Lou Melone, CFP®, CEPA®
The ever-lingering, nonverbal question. It’s a question that’s been and will be asked by the average investor (at least in your mind) - Are you worth your fee (synonymous with, do you add value)? This may not have been verbalized - but don’t believe for a moment you’re not thinking about it. Every time you meet with your financial advisor. Understanding this justifiable concern, how can the advice giver demonstrate his/her value to the client?
If that advice giver is a CPA, there are tangible ways to validate the advice each year, whether a refund received, credits applied, or depreciation taken. However, if you’re in another industry, or to this article’s focus – a Wealth Planner - it can be somewhat of a challenge. Why? A few reasons: a) the value doesn’t display on a client’s quarterly statements as a separate line item and b) it’s a longer-term value, provided during those “return destroying behavioral events”, in the wealth they’ve helped the average investor not drive into the abyss – due to Human Nature. As you will witness in a moment.
Unfortunately, this is not how it’s perceived, especially in the mindset of the average investor. The average investors perception tends to be shorter-term, meaning what you’ve done for the portfolio this year (or maybe – this month). Further complicating the issue of value is that financial advisors cannot guarantee investment performance - nobody can, if they’re honest. And performance of investments most often is the sole purpose investors believe - falsely driven by the financial media and market prognosticators- they’ve engaged a financial professional.
Now recognizing the reality – Again, Is The Advisor Worth Their Fee?
Research from independent sources say – Yes, they are…but there’s a catch. This doesn’t cover ALL advice providers in the financial industry. You see, according to the research, to add value one must not only offer but perform certain services. And as a certified financial planner (CFP®) for twenty-four of my twenty-nine years in this industry – I’ve witnessed that many do not. So, how can those who are not currently providing the necessary services become the valued advisor required to earn their keep?
As Paul Harvey used to say, “And now the rest of the story.”
Russell Investments provided their annual report titled, 2025 Value of An Advisor – the 12th edition, stating “Russell Investments believes investors benefit greatly from the expert guidance that an advisor provides on their investing journey. We also believe that guidance has value. Webster defines value as something that has relative worth, utility or importance, a quality or principle that is desirable, or a numerical quantity determined through calculation. The services an advisor provides reflect all three of the definitions above…
Indeed, our study consistently finds that the value advisors deliver to their clients materially exceeds the 1% fee they typically charge for their services.”
The formula and services analyzed were as follows:
- A- Asset allocation
+
- B- Behavioral coaching
+
- C- Customized family wealth planning
+
- T- Tax-Smart planning and investing
Once the value of the services is added up, they are compared to the average Annual Advisory Fee in the industry - which is typically around one percent per year. The formula created was meant to quantify (as most of what a wealth planner provides is intangible) both the technical and emotional/behavioral contributions provided by an advisor.
Let’s look at the categories and how each adds value:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Asset Allocation: +0.30%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Comfort. Familiarity. These are words that soothe the minds of the average investor. And Human Nature dictates that we do not like change. If we combine these concepts – it’s no surprise that when it comes to building a diversified portfolio, the average investor defaults to what they know. Comparatively – against those portfolios of an investor with an advisor – they can be miles apart. According to the American Association of Individual Investors, a self-directed investor is likely to keep around 20% of a balanced portfolio in cash. In addition, choosing only larger companies when allocating to equities. Below provides a view of how the two compare:

Why is this important?
As we will see later in the Behavioral Coaching section, feeling comfortable and reaching longer-term wealth planning goals can take two different paths. Although a larger portion allocated to cash may provide mental stability, path one, unfortunately it is a drag on the investors’ longer-term returns. The second path - broader diversification - can not only enhance the probability of success longer term but provide a smoother ride along the way.
Below Russell Investments applied actual numbers to the portfolio allocations of Self-Directed and Advisor-Directed, regarding both risk-adjusted returns and dollar growth of those portfolios over a 20-year period.

What you will notice is that the Risk-Adjusted Returns of the Advisor-Directed allocation adds 0.30% return per year since 2005. In addition, when viewing the dollar growth, you’ll witness the value of 100 dollars allocated to the four asset classes over time. The highest return provided by the Advisor-Directed asset allocation. This chart also clearly identifies the drag (purchasing power risk) on a portfolio when invested in cash over time.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Behavioral Coaching: +2.47%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The dominant determinate of long-term, real-life returns that real investors receive
is the behavior of the investors themselves.
-Nick Murray
This is the “mother” of all value added. Let’s begin with this simple fact: Human Nature is a failed investor. Our prehistoric brain, proven with the rise of Behavioral Science, is hard-wired with cognitive bias and heuristics that lead the average investor to react to market events as a perceived threat (shown below in orange as the monthly net flow of cash into and out of Mutual Funds/ETF’s). This behavior is no different than how cavemen would have reacted to the threat of a Saber-Toothed Tiger at full charge, fangs protruding.
Conversely, according to Russell, “as the chart demonstrates, some investors rely on backward-looking information to make forward looking decisions. Let’s use the March 2020 pandemic outbreak as an example. Investors pulled $330 billion out of the market. They had already felt some pain at that point as they had lost 9% in the prior 12 months. But those investors who left then missed out on the subsequent 12-month return of 63%. Even if they had decided to reinvest at some point they wouldn’t have captured the entire upside.” It provides evidence of how the average investor continued to buy after it had already begun to climb and sell after it began to fall. Simply stated – Bought High and Sold Low. Viewed another way – if the average investor wanted market like returns - all could have been accomplished by doing one seemingly simple task – not reacting to the noise from the financial media. A media that spews end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it on a daily basis.

Furthermore, although we are no longer running from Saber-Toothed Tigers, the stimulus we are running from, financially, elicits the same physiological responses. In other words, when it comes to financial decisions, we tend to act like knuckle-dragging cave people.
This prehistoric reaction triggers a gap. We call this the investor behavior gap (Annualized cost to retail “chasers”) which is shown from the research below by comparing the Average Investor Return vs. the S&P 500 Index from 2010-2024:
Clearly, the average investor has consistently behaved themselves out of 2.47% per year in return. All due to Human Nature’s pitfalls – as I referenced above in the embedded longer-term value advisors can provide.
Behavioral Finance tells us we have over 200 different cognitive biases, the most common to investors’ pitfalls are the following:
- Loss Aversion
- We value gains and losses differently. We feel the pain of loss twice as much as the pleasure of a gain.
- Overconfidence
- A tendency to hold a false and misleading assessment of our skills, intellect, or talent. In short, it's an egotistical belief that we're better than we actually are.
- Herding
- Going with the crowd. Assuming things are good or bad because others are doing the same.
- Mental Accounting
- Although every dollar is the same, we mentally attach a different value on each dollar, based on how it was acquired.
- Familiarity
- The preference of the individuals to remain confined to what is familiar to them. They wish to remain within their comfort zone and do not want to take the path never taken.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Customized Family Wealth Planning: +1.13%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The wealth planning industry is evolving – albeit slowly – and if your planner/planner’s firm has not adjusted their practice to it, they may not realize it yet but will soon be the way of the Saber-Toothed Tiger.
The foundation of any successful planner/client relationship is a comprehensive financial plan. Let me state this simple, but powerful fact, one more time - it is the foundation. Anything less is smoke-and-mirrors wrapped in a bow of the asset management package (a Robo Advisor). Being a self-proclaimed voice of reality, if this is all the advisor is providing, you may be better off at a Robo Advisor. The “Asset Allocator” may have been sufficient in the years prior to the 1990’s but not anymore.
How can one be certain of the prior statement? There is NO historical evidence for the persistence of performance. None. And if that’s the one and only service your advisor is providing, if you’re honest with yourself, you’re most likely getting overcharged.
Let’s examine this a bit further.
What’s the value of the typical ancillary services an advisor and his/her team offer compared to a Robo Advisor? Ancillary services provided to clients such as: addressing tax and estate planning, cash management, trust services, financial planning, wealth education, succession planning, family relationship management, lifestyle planning, career and giving strategies, insurance needs, custom requests, and questions. These additional services can quickly consume 20, 50, or 100 hours each year. If the advisor/firm offers these ancillary services, Russell Investments estimates that the total planning fee is about 1.50% - as the chart below shows.

In summary, Russell states, “This means that the work you do to guide your clients through the defining moments of their lives, to ensure their investments align with their goals, to provide expertise on taxes, insurance, careers, and major purchases, to plan their retirement, long-term care needs, and legacy—among a myriad of other services—has value. We believe it can be worth 1.13% more in value over and above the basic asset management that an investor can get from a Robo Advisor.”
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Tax-Smart Planning and Investing: +0.97%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
How much return can be added with a tax-smart approach? According to Russell Investments, the average annual tax-drag for the five years ending December 31, 2024 was significant. Investors in non-tax managed U.S. equity products (active, passive, and ETFs) lost on average 1.76% of their return to taxes, Passive US Equity Funds was a drag of 1.01% and those in tax-managed U.S. equity funds forfeited only 0.79%. That’s a value difference of 0.97%.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
THE BOTTOM LINE: WHAT IS THE VALUE OF A PLANNER?
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- A- Asset allocation: +0.30%
+
- B- Behavioral coaching: +2.47%
+
- C- Customized family wealth planning: +1.13%
+
- T- Tax-Smart planning and investing: +0.97%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL VALUE OF PLANNER
~ 4.87%
TYPICAL ADVISOR CHARGE FOR SERVICES
1%
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The bottom line: According to Russell investments, If the provider of advice cannot deliver multiples of the value of their annual fee, the client should and is better off to go elsewhere. However, according to the study, the advisor can provide said value if he/she adheres to a comprehensive approach to family wealth management.
Disclosure:
All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.
All investments include a risk of loss that clients should be prepared to bear.
The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change based on market and other conditions. These documents may contain certain statements that may be deemed forward‐looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Any projections, market outlooks, or estimates are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed as indicative of actual events that will occur.
Market data was sourced using Russell Investments April 2025, Advice Study.
Please remember that all investments carry some level of risk, including the potential loss of principal invested. They do not typically grow at an even rate of return and may experience negative growth. As with any type of portfolio structuring, attempting to reduce risk and increase return could, at certain times, unintentionally reduce returns.
Diversification and strategic asset allocation do not assure profit or protect against loss in declining markets.
The Investment Company Institute is the national trade association of U.S. investment companies, which includes mutual funds, closed-end funds, exchange traded funds and unit investment trusts.
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index: An index, with income reinvested, generally representative of intermediate term government bonds, investment grade corporate debt securities, and mortgage-backed securities (specifically: Barclays Government/Corporate Bond Index, the Asset-Backed Securities Index, and the Mortgage-Backed Securities Index).
FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Index: A global market capitalization weighted index composed of listed real estate securities in the North American, European and Asian real estate markets.
MSCI Emerging Markets Index: A float-adjusted market capitalization index that consists of indices in 21 emerging economies: Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Egypt, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and Turkey.
The MSCI EAFE Index is an equity index which captures large- and midcap representation across 21 developed markets countries around the world, excluding the U.S. and Canada. With 918 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free float adjusted market capitalization in each country. Countries include: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the U.K.
The MSCI World ex U.S. Index tracks global stock market performance that includes developed and emerging markets but excludes the U.S.
The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of the large-cap growth segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000 companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of the large-cap value segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000 companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower expected growth values.
The Russell 2000® Index measures the performance of the small-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Russell 2000 Index is a subset of the Russell 3000® Index representing approximately 10% of the total market capitalization of that index. It includes approximately 2,000 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership.
The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the largest 3,000 U.S. companies representing approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market.
The S&P 500® Index is an index, with dividends reinvested, of 500 issues representative of leading companies in the U.S. large cap securities market.
Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly. Returns represent past performance, are not a guarantee of future performance, and are not indicative of any specific investment.
Past performance does not guarantee future performance.
Nothing contained in this material is intended to constitute legal, tax, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from a licensed professional.
Russell Investments’ ownership is composed of a majority stake held by funds managed by TA Associates Management, LP, with a significant minority stake held by funds managed by Reverence Capital Partners L.P. Certain of Russell Investments’ employees and Hamilton Lane Advisors, LLC also hold minority, noncontrolling, ownership stakes.
Frank Russell Company is the owner of the Russell trademarks contained in this material and all trademark rights related to the Russell trademarks, which the members of the Russell Investments group of companies are permitted to use under license from Frank Russell Company.
The members of the Russell Investments group of companies are not affiliated in any manner with Frank Russell Company russellinvestments.com
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Call Russell Investments at 800-787-7354 or visit russellinvestments.com. or any entity operating under the “FTSE
RUSSELL” brand.
To view the full study, go to https://russellinvestments.com/us/resources/financial-professionals/value-of-advisor
Melone Private Wealth LLC ("Melone Wealth ") is a registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Melone Wealth provides investment advisory and related services for clients nationally.
Behavioral Investing
"The dominate determinate of long-term, real life investment returns is the behavior of the investor themselves." --- Nick Murray
14x Winner of Five Star Wealth Manager*
Lou Melone, CFP®, CEPA® is a 14x winner of the Five Star Wealth Manager award.*
2023 & 2024 Award Winner
Branden Carney is a 2023 & 2024 award winner of the Five Star Wealth Manager award.*
*Disclosure: This award was issued on 05/01/2025 by Five Star Professional (FSP) for the time period 08/21/2024 through 02/28/2025. Fee paid for use of marketing materials. Self-completed questionnaire was used for rating. This rating is not related to the quality of the investment advice and based solely on the disclosed criteria. 3715 Detroit-area wealth managers were considered for the award; 289 (8 % of candidates) were named 2025 Five Star Wealth Managers. The following prior year statistics use this format: YEAR: # Considered, # Winners, % of candidates, Issued Date, Research Period. 2024: 3,651, 278, 8%, 5/1/24, 9/5/23 - 2/29/24; 2023: 3,550, 312, 8.7%, 5/1/23, 9/5/22 - 3/3/23; 2022: 3273, 304, 9%, 5/1/22, 9/3/21 - 3/11/22; 2021: 3260, 275, 8%, 5/1/21, 8/10/20 - 3/19/21; 2020: 3105, 284, 9%, 5/1/20, 8/1/19 - 3/20/20; 2019: 2987, 347, 12%, 5/1/19, 8/21/18 - 3/19/19; 2018: 3069, 322, 10%, 5/1/18, 8/30/17 - 3/19/18; 2017: 1836, 356, 19%, 5/1/17, 8/24/16 - 2/24/17; 2016: 1961, 630, 32%, 4/1/16, 10/22/15 - 3/9/16; 2015: 2238, 627, 28%, 5/1/15, 10/22/14 - 3/9/15; 2014: 3448, 658, 19%, 5/1/14, 10/22/13 - 3/9/14; 2013: 2762, 749, 27%, 5/1/13, 10/22/12 - 3/9/13; 2012: 2658, 745, 28%, 5/1/12, 10/22/11 - 3/9/12. Wealth managers do not pay a fee to be considered or placed on the final list of Five Star Wealth Managers. The award is based on 10 objective criteria. Eligibility criteria - required: 1. Credentialed as a registered investment adviser (RIA) or a registered investment adviser representative; 2. Actively licensed as a RIA or as a principal of a registered investment adviser firm for a minimum of 5 years; 3. Favorable regulatory and complaint history review (As defined by FSP, the wealth manager has not; A. Been subject to a regulatory action that resulted in a license being suspended or revoked, or payment of a fine; B. Had more than a total of three settled or pending complaints filed against them and/or a total of five settled, pending, dismissed or denied complaints with any regulatory authority or FSP's consumer complaint process. Unfavorable feedback may have been discovered through a check of complaints registered with a regulatory authority or complaints registered through FSP's consumer complaint process; feedback may not be representative of any one client's experience; C. Individually contributed to a financial settlement of a customer complaint; D. Filed for personal bankruptcy within the past 11 years; E. Been terminated from a financial services firm within the past 11 years; F. Been convicted of a felony); 4. Fulfilled their firm review based on internal standards; 5. Accepting new clients. Evaluation criteria - considered: 6. One-year client retention rate; 7. Five-year client retention rate; 8. Non-institutional discretionary and/or non-discretionary client assets administered; 9. Number of client households served; 10. Education and professional designations. FSP does not evaluate quality of services provided to clients. The award is not indicative of the wealth manager's future performance. Wealth managers may or may not use discretion in their practice and therefore may not manage their clients' assets. The inclusion of a wealth manager on the Five Star Wealth Manager list should not be construed as an endorsement of the wealth manager by FSP or this publication. Working with a Five Star Wealth Manager or any wealth manager is no guarantee as to future investment success, nor is there any guarantee that the selected wealth managers will be awarded this accomplishment by FSP in the future. Visit www.fivestarprofessional.com.